Two club members cut a road through the brush and a backhoe was brought in along with a strong chain to loop around each stone. Each stone was then carefully lifted, and laboriously moved one by one up to the spot they currently reside. Metal pieces that accompanied the millstones were also lying about at the main creek bed. Several long-time members believe that these pieces of metal hardware may still exist on the property. These pieces resemble iron angle bars and other unrecognizable shapes used in the millstone process.
Is this the end of the story? Not really. The story is incomplete because the versions don’t match up. There is also a mention from Gene Holland that one of the neighboring owners wanted the stones taken off of his hands and the Club was more than welcoming of the addition to the Shotgun range. This is Possible Location #3.
Back then, vegetation was different, topography was different, and property lines were different. Some of the property was being used in farming and some of it was forested. Growth today includes some large oak trees, but it is mostly small trees beside the open fields. Which location fits best? Here are the choices again:
Possible Location #1
Evidence For: The physical geography around the culvert has all the appearances where sluicing was performed.
Evidence Against There should be water to flow through culverts and sluices but from where? Times change as does nature, but the answer is not there.
Possible Location #2
Evidence For: The stream is there providing a water source for sluicing. This particular stream is documented on earlier plats. More recent sewage systems, roads and developments changed the topography of the area. 3
Evidence Against: Location is not where the stones were seen 35 years prior. No actual evidence of a culvert based on March 2023 investigation.
Possible Location #3
Evidence For: Motivation to recover the stones from a neighboring property would motivate recovery efforts taken. The stones might have been on the actual property line and a potential property issue?
Evidence Against: Previous communications indicated the stones were on Club property. There was no question or issues raised in board minutes.
All of the versions mentioned by these respected members are possibly accurate.
Could there be a fourth possible theory?
A fourth possible theory may explain how all three may be correct. Possible Location #1 is the location of a culvert along with large shards of quartz on the ground representing a processing area. Were the stones there in 1970, and at some point, in the 1999-2005 time frame, the stones were for some reason relocated to Possible Location #2? In the late 1960’s, the shotgun range was revamped (before the existence of the clubhouse) and among the improvements, maybe somebody moved the stones down to the creek. It's just a theory. The Possible Location #2 is near two neighboring property owners who may not have had ownership but may have been involved? This would unite all the accounts.
There is one more thing to mention. Like the Old Reed Gold Mine in North Carolina, there should be a second “Running Millstone." Even though these stones are heavy, it could still be on the property somewhere hidden from view.
When at the club, and the Shotgun range is open, be sure to take a moment and visit them, touch the history of when gold was mined in Waxhaw, North Carolina.
Sources:
1 The First Fifty Years of the Charlotte Rifle & Pistol Club
2 Reed Gold Mine State Historic Site, Cabarrus, NC.
3 U.S. Geological Survey, Mineral Resources Program for the U. S. Mining Industry, 1968, (located) Monroe County Library, Monroe, NC.
*Special Thanks to Club Members Jim Deveraux, Hugh Stone, Jim Payne, Gene Holland, and Phil Murray.